Legal Opinion
Baltimore County v. Fraternal Order of Police, Baltimore County Lodge No. 4
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 25, 2016No. 25/15PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDonald, j.
As authorized under local law, Petitioner Baltimore County engages in collective bargaining with its employees. Respondent Fraternal Order of Police, Baltimore County Lodge No. 4 (“FOP”) represents the County’s eligible police officers. The County and FOP have entered into numerous collective bargaining agreements over the years. This case arose out of a dispute over the interpretation of a provision in some of those agreements that provided for a fixed subsidy of health insurance costs for officers who retired during certain years.
The dispute proceeded, in accordance with the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- M&G Polymers United States, LLC v. TackettSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Garner v. Archers Glen Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Maryland State Teachers Ass'n v. HughesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Selective Way v. NationwideCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Holloway v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Atkinson v. Anne Arundel Cnty.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Doyle v. Frontline Asset Strategies, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.