Legal Opinion

Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Boyd

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 10, 1938No. 10760PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CODY, Justice.

Relator seeks to mandamus Hon. Ewing Boyd, judge of one of the district courts of Harris county, to set aside an order entered by him granting respondent Turk a new trial, and to give full force and effect .to the judgment previously rendered in favor of relator against respondent Turk. The procedure and practice in the district courts of Harris county are governed by article 2092, R.S.1925, as amended.

The jury returned a verdict on special issues on October 24, 1937. Relator filed its motion for judgment on such verdict on October 30, 1937; and on the same day respondent Turk…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dallas Storage & Warehouse Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Highland Farms Corp. v. Fidelity Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. WatkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Anchor v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. BrewsterTexas Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Public Service Employees Credit Union, Inc. v. ProcterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Nash v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API