Legal Opinion

Marz v. City of Newport

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 10, 1917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*148Opinion of the Court by

Judge Miller

Affirming.

■ By this action Theodore Marz, a citizen and taxpayer of the city of Newport, and the owner of a house and lot on East Tenth street in said city, seeks to enjoin the construction of that street in front of his property. He also asks that the contract entered into by the City of Newport with Metzel & O’Hearn, contractors, for that purpose, be declared invalid. The contract requires the street to be constructed at the cost of the abutting property owners.

It is not contended that the statutory requirements necessary under the charter, were not fully…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Becker v. RothCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Trapp v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  3. Meyer v. City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  4. Illinois Central R. R. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Spahn v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Realty Savings Co. v. Southern Asphaltoilene Road Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Peicke v. City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Clark County Fiscal Court v. Powell County Fiscal CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. First National Bank v. City of PaducahCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API