Legal Opinion

Frisch v. Penn Township

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Before this Court are the consolidated appeals of Furnley H. Frisch (Frisch) from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Perry County denying Frisch’s post-trial motions and making final its April 7, 1993 order that (1) dismissed Frisch’s mandamus action seeking to compel Penn Township (Township) to reopen Barnett Drive and (2) directed Frisch to submit a storm water management plan to Penn Township and complete any necessary storm water management repairs. The issues presented by Frisch are whether the trial court erred in failing to order the Township to reopen Barnett Drive…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Dental Ass'n v. Commonwealth Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Zitelli v. Dermatology Education & Research FoundationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Bahor v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Pennsylvania Dental Ass'n v. Commonwealth Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. School District of Philadelphia v. Council of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. WorleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Bolus v. SaundersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Barness Land Development Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Martin v. KelleherCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API