Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Navy

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided July 22, 2011No. CV-09-354-PBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Lambert v . Navy CV-09-354-PB 7/22/11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Colonel Gary E . Lambert v. Civil N o . 09-cv-00354-PB Opinion N o .

2011 DNH 117

Raymond E . Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the Navy MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

10 U.S.C. § 14704

establishes the procedures that the Secretaries of the Army, Air Force, and Navy must follow when making reductions to a Reserve Active Status List (“RASL”). Section 14704 requires the Secretary of the relevant military department to determine the size of the reduction but leaves it to a specially convened “selection board” to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. John F. Kreis v. Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  3. Dennis A. Dickson v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  4. Succar v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. Muscogee (Creek) Nation, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe v. Donald Hodel, Secretary, U.S. Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API