Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Gore v. Rains & Block

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1991No. Docket 114744Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGillis, P.J.

While I agree with the remainder of the majority opinion, I would affirm the circuit court’s order granting defendants’ motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict with respect to Virginia Gore’s loss of consortium claim and reverse the trial court’s order denying defendants’ motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict with respect to the jury’s separate $60,000 verdict in favor of Mark Gore for emotional distress caused by the legal malpractice.

Dr. Lin removed Mark Gore’s testicle on April 14, 1983, suspecting cancer. Malignant cancer was confirmed, and Mark Gore was scheduled to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daley v. LaCroixMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Veselenak v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. BASIC Food INDUSTRIES, INC v. GRANTMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Ledbetter v. Brown City Savings BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Furby v. Raymark Industries, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API