Mitchell v. Hennion
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGakkett, Presiding Judge
The decision in this case was rendered March 20, 1944. The party Mitchell filed petition for rehearing which has been duly considered and same is denied on the merits, but granted in order to correct two expressions inadvertently used in the original opinion.
We have before us here appeals from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners (to. which we hereinafter refer as the board) in a patent interference proceeding.
Five counts (1 to 5, inclusive) are involved. The board awarded priority to the party Hennion upon counts 1, 2, 3, and 4, and the party Mitchell appealed as to that…
2Cited by6 opinions
- In re HarringtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Tong Seae Industrial Co. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
- Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- In Re John v. Harrington and Henning H. Borchers in Re Detlef WinkelmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.