Legal Opinion

Secord v. Foutch

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1880PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Gladwin. Information in the nature of quo warranto. Relator brings error in Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

An information in the nature of a quo warranto was filed on behalf of relator in the circuit court for the county of Gladwin, to try the title of respondent to the office of judge of probate for that county. Respondent was appointed by the governor, in September, 1878, in place of the regular incumbent, Aaron D. Stevens, who had been elected for the term which began in January, 1877, but who, it is agreed, removed from the county in May, 1877. Relator claims to have been elected at the regular general election in November, 1878. No notice was'given of this election as including a vacancy in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Speed v. HartwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  2. People ex rel. Moore v. WitherellMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  3. People ex rel. Rogers v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People, Ex Rel. Woods v. . CrisseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Adsit v. OsmunMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Griffith v. County Court of Merger CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State ex rel. Sampson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Conroy v. HallowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API