Legal Opinion

Union Cemetery Co. v. Harrison

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1924No. 6 Div. 269PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbicken, P. J.

This is an action On the case by the appellee against the appellant to recover damages alleged to have resulted fx-om a nuisance. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

The plaintiff’s theory, as indicated by the pleadings and proof, is that noxious and disagreeable odors arising fx-om a cemetery conducted by the defendant polluted the atmosphere aboxxt his residence to his injury and discomfort.

The whole law of nuisance rests upon the maxim of the common law; “Sic utere tuo alienum non laodas” — every man must so use his own property as not to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Savannah, Americus & Montgomery Railway v. BufordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Travis v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Adler & Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Birmingham Water Works Co. v. MartiniAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. City of Eufaula v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Braun v. IannottiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1934
  2. Bryson v. PhelpsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Thomas v. FrostUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Evans v. Walter Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2008
  5. Abrams v. CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS CORP.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API