Union Cemetery Co. v. Harrison
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBbicken, P. J.
This is an action On the case by the appellee against the appellant to recover damages alleged to have resulted fx-om a nuisance. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.
The plaintiff’s theory, as indicated by the pleadings and proof, is that noxious and disagreeable odors arising fx-om a cemetery conducted by the defendant polluted the atmosphere aboxxt his residence to his injury and discomfort.
The whole law of nuisance rests upon the maxim of the common law; “Sic utere tuo alienum non laodas” — every man must so use his own property as not to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Savannah, Americus & Montgomery Railway v. BufordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Travis v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Adler & Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Birmingham Water Works Co. v. MartiniAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
- City of Eufaula v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Braun v. IannottiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1934
- Bryson v. PhelpsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
- Thomas v. FrostUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- Evans v. Walter Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2008
- Abrams v. CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS CORP.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009