Legal Opinion

Margolis v. McCarthy

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided January 13, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Merrick, PJ.

Plaintiffs Missy Daboul Margolis (the “Broker”) and her husband have appealed the dismissal of this action and award of attorney’s fees under G.Lc. 231, §59H, the statute curbing so-called SLAPP suits or “Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation.”

The Broker and a co-broker brought separate small claims actions in the Framingham Division of the District Court Department against defendants Edward D. and Joyce McCarthy (the “Investors”) to recover a commission in connection with the sale of real estate. They recovered total damages of $3,288.00 against the Investors in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Duracraft Corp. v. Holmes Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. CRIBERG v. RaymondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Robert L. Sullivan, D.D.S., P.C. v. BirminghamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. Patry v. Liberty Mobilehome Sales, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Aborn v. LipsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Salafia v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
  2. Rasten v. ZimbovskyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API