Samuel CARROLL, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WISDOM, Circuit Judge:
This case raises issues related to hiring, job assignment, training, promotion, compensation, and termination at the Shreveport facilities of the defendant, Sears, Roebuck & Company (“Sears”). The plaintiffs, two black employees of Sears in Shreveport, filed this class action under Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (1976), alleging that employment practices at Sears discriminated against blacks. The district court rejected these allegations. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I. Background
Sears is a national chain of department stores…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hazelwood School District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Susan Waltman v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Ernest L. Griffin, Cross-Appellees v. Carl Carlin, Postmaster General, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Atonio v. Wards Cove Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- 35 Fair empl.prac.cas. 697, 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,582 Henry Irby, Cross-Appellees v. Mike Sullivan, Jr., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.