Legal Opinion

Newcomb v. Kloeblen

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On error to the Hudson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court ivas delivered by

Vroom, J.

This action was brought by S. Judd & Company against the defendant below, Albert Kloeblen, as guar-*792autor for goods sold to his son, James Kloeblen. It appeared from the evidence at the trial that the plaintiffs below were live stock commission merchants. James Kloeblen was one of their customers. In the month of April, 1906, the plaintiffs refused to make any further sales to him unless they had a guarantee of bis account from his father, the defendant in this suit. Such a guarantee was procured from the defendant, and a copy of the same is…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stearns v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Conley v. EasleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Conley v. EasleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Samuel Cooling & Security Trust Co. v. SpringerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1943
  5. Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP v. MuntjanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API