Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Bartels

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 23, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

I hold that the executrix is not entitled to commissions on the unsold real estate. Section 285 of the Surrogate’s Court Act regulates the amount of commissions which may be allowed an executor. The recent amendments to the Decedent Estate Law (Laws of 1929, chap. 229) in no way affect the allowance of commissions to executors. (Matter of McCarthy, 145 Misc. 556.) For the management and collection of rents of the real property pursuant to section 13 of the Decedent Estate Law (as added by Laws of 1929, chap. 229, § 1), the executrix is amply compensated by an allowance of five per…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of the Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of WanningerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. In re the Estate of McCarthyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SaphirNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
  2. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. KlawNew York Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API