Forte v. Locke Insulator Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Motion to dismiss appeal denied and motion to substitute administratrix of deceased plaintiff granted. Memorandum: Our determination is based upon the literal language of section 89 of the Civil Practice Act. We have not overlooked decisions which may seem to point in a general direction in conflict with our determination here. (Wood v. Phillips, 11 Abb. Pr. [N. S.] 1; Carr v. Rischer, 119 N. Y. 117, 124; Matter of Tubbiolo, 146 App. Div. 323; Molloy v. Starin, 134 id. 542; Lutz v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 44 id. 256; Kelsey v. Jewett, 34 Hun, 11.) Nevertheless, in none of the cases was the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carr v. . RischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- In re TubbioloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bronheim v. KelleherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Musso v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945