McComas v. Hull
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion the Court by
Sims, Commissioner
Affirming.
This is a second appeal and the opinion on the former appeal appears in 274 Ky. 192, 118 S. W. (2d) 540. An examination of that opinion shows the judgment was reversed because certain parties were not brought before the court. The errors assigned whereby appellants seek a reversal of the„ judgment here appealed from are: 1. Failure to bring certain parties before the court; 2. the admission of incompetent evidence offered by appellees; 3. exclusion of competent evidence offered by appellants; 4. there was not sufficient evidence to warrant the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cheatham v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
- Wall v. DimmittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Mullins v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- McComas v. HullCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Cain v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Golladay v. GolladayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- Welch's Adm'r v. CliftonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- Skidmore v. NapierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Hall v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.