Jones v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
Held: Petitioners sustained a net loss by theft in 1948, in the amount of $ 1,250. Mary Frances Allen, 16 T. C. 163, distinguished.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
Van Fossan, Judge:
The question presented involves two factors— whether the pin in question was in fact stolen, and if so, its basis in the hands of the donor. It is respondent’s contention with regard to the first factor that the facts adduced on the record do not offer a basis for drawing a logical inference that the pin was lost by theft. To support such position, respondent relies heavily upon our opinion in Mary Frances Allen, 16 T. C. 163.
The case so relied upon is clearly distinguishable from the one before us. There, the taxpayer lost a brooch while visiting the Metropolitan…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Allen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
3Cited by35 opinions
- Monteleone v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
- Elliott v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
- Weingarten v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
- Jacobson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
- Skolnik v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.