Legal Opinion
In Re Gould Securities, Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 13, 1989No. 86 C 3598PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
The parties have settled this securities fraud class action. On August 30, 1989, we entered an interim award of attorneys’ fees to class counsel. That award was based on figures about which there was no dispute. We now consider the disputed claims for fees and make a final award. There being nor dispute, and based on our own review, we also award all of the expenses claimed in the petition. We further consider, and reject, the claims of the class representatives for incentive awards for having undertaken the litigation of this suit.
I.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roberts v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Altnor v. Preferred Freezer Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- In re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
- Spicer v. Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Morris v. TateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.