Mygatt v. Tarbell
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for MUwcmkee County. Action to recover one balf of the proceeds of the sale of certain property under an execution. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit.
1Opinion of the CourtOktoN, J.
The only facts necessary, to an understanding of this case are as follows: The defendant, by Ms attorney, J. G. Flanders, Esq., on the 4th day of May, 1888, caused an execution to be issued on a judgment of nearly $32,000 in his favor and against one John E. Burton, and to be placed in the hands of the sheriff of Milwaukee county. The plaintiff, by Glenway Maxon, Esq., his attorney, caused an execution to be issued and placed in the hands of said sheriff, on a judgment in his favor and against said Burton, of nearly $12,000, on the 10th day of May, 1888. The said sheriff first attempted to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eadie, Guilford & Co. v. AshbaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Crans v. . HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Meehan v. . ForresterNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- People ex rel. Adams v. Goss & Phillips Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Beidman v. GoodellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stack v. Roth Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Holden & Martin v. GilfeatherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906