Legal Opinion

Haas v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1941No. 3370PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By GEIGER, PJ.

This matter is before this court upon appeal from a final order of the Court of Common Pleas under date of January 30, 1941, wherein the demurrer to the second amended petition, filed by the plaintiff, was sustained as to the second and third cause of action.

It is further ordered,

“It appearing to the court that the plaintiff does not desire to plead further and setting up only a claim for interest in the amount of $101.25, it is ordered that the second amended petition be and the same hereby is dismissed. Judgment is accordingly rendered to the defendant for its costs.”

Not…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pickett v. Lloyd'sSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. Mitchell v. Intermountain Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Gross v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Carpenter v. Liberty Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
  5. Vernon Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. SharpIndiana Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API