Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Krueger

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 18, 1979No. 17484PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Justice.

The plaintiffs appeal from a take nothing summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants.

The plaintiffs contend that their overriding royalty interest, reserved under a farm-out of a 1969 oil and gas lease, was “washed out” when the owners of the working interest allowed the lease to expire, and that defendant Krueger, who in 1975 bought the leasehold equipment from the working interest owners and then acquired a new lease from the landowner, became bound under the terms of the lease and farmout agreement to honor the plaintiffs’ overriding royalty interest.

The essential…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Greene v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Sunac Petroleum Corporation v. ParkesTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Meers v. Frick-Reid Supply Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Moore v. Jet Stream Investments, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  2. Exploration Co. v. Vega Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Lone Star Gas Co. v. Mexia Oil & Gas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  4. United States v. Viking Resources, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  5. Stroud Production, L.L.C. v. HosfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API