Legal Opinion

Nathan Abernathy v. Larry Bertram and Keith Broyles

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 2012No. 33A04-1106-CC-317PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

Nathan Abernathy appeals some of the trial court's findings in his action against Keith Broyles and Larry Bertram for breach of contract, quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, and conversion. He presents two issues for our review:

1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied him a damages award equal to an expected payment from Abernathy's erop insurance policy; and

2. Whether the trial court erred when it determined Abernathy was not entitled to damages for conversion.

We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In the late spring of 2007, Broyles and Abernathy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Greives v. GreenwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Bowyer v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Tracy v. MorellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. McKeighen v. Daviess County Fair BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Everett Quinton v. Christie Cain and The Estate of Roger Cain (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Wayne Evans v. Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API