In re Houston

AMENDED ORDER IMPOSING SANCTION FOR CONTEMPT

By order issued June 23, 1999, this Court found the respondent, Daniel K. Houston, to be in contempt of this Court for failing to comply with two investigative subpoenas issued by the Disciplinary Commission. Matter of Houston, 711 N.E.2d 33 (Ind.1999). As a result of that finding, this Court suspended the respondent from the practice of law in this state until such time as he complied with the subpoenas. Additionally, he was ordered to file an affidavit as required by Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26)(c)(l).1

We now find that the respondent…