Anderson v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
Defendant claims the trial judge abused his judicial discretion in sentencing the defendant to prison instead of placing him on probation. Every case has its frame of reference. Here that backdrop is the sentencing phase of the judicial process in criminal cases.
It is thus necessary to begin, even though we repeat what has been said before by this court — and very recently so — with the wide discretion given trial judges in this state in determining an appropriate sentence in a particular case. As to appellate review of trial court sentences, our court has made clear that “ ‘. . . all an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McCleary v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. HutnikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Rosado v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Ocanas v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. KilloryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Elias v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. WickstromCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- State v. Curbello-RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- State v. SpearsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.