Legal Opinion

Cornell v. Irvine

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1898No. 10233PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Hall, J. Cases cited by counsel are discussed -in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Ryan, C.

The defendant in error appealed to the district court of Lancaster county from the disallowance of his claim by the auditor of public accounts of this state, and on his appeal secured the allowance sought by him, and the said auditor now seeks to reverse the judgment of the district court by these proceedings in error. Omitting mere formal parts the petition in the district court was in the following language:

“The said Frank Irvine, ¡appellant, for cause of action states:
“1. That the ¡said John F. Cornell is, and' for more than a year past has been, the auditor of public accounts of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Bryan v. CattellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  3. Love v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Langdon v. Town of CastletonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  5. Commonwealth v. HawkesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PorterNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. State ex rel. Josephs v. DouglassNevada Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Dyche v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. County of Sargent v. SweetmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Lindsley v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API