Legal Opinion
Tamas v. Family Video Movie Club, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 8, 2015No. 11 C 1024PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
l ORDER
Magistrate Judge Mary M. Rowland
Plaintiff Alina Tamas, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed a motion to compel Defendant Family Video Movie Club, Inc. (“Family Video”) to supplement its Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures. (Dkt. 262). The motion is granted in part.
Background
Plaintiff, Alina Tamas, brings this putative elass/colleetive action pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the Illinois Minimum Wage Law (“IMWL”), 820 Ill. Comp. Stat. § 105/1 et seq., against Defendant Family Video Movie Club, Inc. (“Family Video”).…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sender v. MannDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2004
- The Lakin Law Firm, P.C. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Robinson v. Champaign Unit 4 School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Thurby v. Encore Receivable Management, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2008
3Cited by4 opinions
- Daniels v. Hyster-Yale Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2020
- Ludwig v. Elk-Point Jefferson School District 61-7District Court, D. South Dakota · 2019
- OPIO v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET GROUP INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
- State Of New York v. Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, LTD.District Court, W.D. New York · 2020