Legal Opinion

Gengler v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided January 15, 1999No. A-6761Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, J.

James J. Gengler was charged with driving while intoxicated. At Gengler’s trial, the State relied on the result of an Intoximeter test (ie., a breath test) that was administered to Gengler following his arrest.

Under regulations promulgated by the Department of Public Safety, the calibration of every breath test machine used in Alaska must be verified at least every 60 days. 1 The calibration of the Intoximeter machine used to test Gengler’s breath had been verified at regular intervals prior to Gengler’s test; but, following Gengler’s test, the police failed to verify the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Herter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API