Legal Opinion

Hudson, Et Vir v. Weiland

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 8, 1942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case reaches us by appeal from final judgment for the defendants entered upon their demurrer to the second amended first count of plaintiff's second amended declaration.

Inasmuch as determination of the controversy depends upon the sufficiency of this pleading we will, at the outset, give an analysis of its allegations. Defendant Weiland is a physician; defendant Dyer the operator of a device for administering artificial heat by causing electricity to course through the body. Plaintiff's left hand and arm had become injured and the defendant physician recommended that the treatment…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BeazleySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. Duval v. HuntSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  3. Feneff v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. J. G. Christopher Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  5. Benedict Pineapple Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dohr v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. Grobman v. PoseyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Davidow v. SeyfarthSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  4. Dawson v. WeemsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Kennedy v. GaskellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API