Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Hirvonen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1989No. 55151-1PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Petitioners Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate), Mrs. Hirvonen, and the estate of Mr. Hirvonen, challenge certain statements made by the Court of Appeals after it essentially vacated the judgment against all defendants in an automobile liability suit. The Court of Appeals stated that Allstate, Mr. Hirvonen’s insurer, would be bound as a party if it had controlled the insured's defense and remanded to determine the issue of control. The court added that Mrs. Hirvonen, a defendant, could not relitigate any issue decided at trial in any subsequent action. We affirm the appellate court's action…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Weber v. BiddleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Thomas Dodrill v. Robert Ludt, Niles Police Department John A. Ross, Niles Police Department and City of NilesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  4. Ward v. MagahaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Raymond v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Beal v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Beal for Martinez v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Pybas v. PaolinoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. Will v. Frontier Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Craig v. LudyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API