Legal Opinion

In the Interest of K.M.S.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 10, 2001No. 05-00-00146-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAGARDE, Justice.

David Gernenz appeals the trial court’s judgment refusing to set aside an order *63declaring Christopher Shane Smith to be the father of K.M.S. Gernenz brings eight issues asserting the trial court erred by (a) failing to vacate an agreed order declaring Smith to be KM.S.’s father without requiring scientific paternity testing; and (b) failing to order paternity testing of K.M.S. In his second issue, Gernenz contends that his constitutional right to due process was violated by Smith’s failure to give him notice of Smith’s paternity action that ultimately led to an agreed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Alexander v. HagedornTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Caldwell v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In the Interest of J.W.T.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Gunn v. CavanaughTexas Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re DoeTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Heraldo Escobar v. Tony Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2014
  3. In Re KMS, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
  4. Lee A. Hughes Custom Homes, Inc. D/B/A Maverick Homes v. Robert and Jackie Shows, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  5. Lee A. Hughes Custom Homes, Inc. D/B/A Maverick Homes v. Robert and Jackie Shows, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API