Legal Opinion

In the Interest of C.R.C.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 2006No. 05CA2468PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge GRAHAM.

In this allocation of parental responsibilities proceeding, Yardeshia Wilford (mother) appeals from the permanent orders allocating parental responsibilities between her and Michael Coleman (great-uncle). We reverse and remand with directions to enter a new order allocating parental responsibilities entirely to mother.

Mother and Sydney Coleman, also known as Devarow Drake or Sydney Drake (father), are the parents of one child, born in April 2000. Until July 2002, mother and the child lived “off and on” with father. When they were not living with him, they lived with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Moore v. AsenteKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Gebhardt v. GebhardtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. C.R.S. v. T.A.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. In the Interest of E.L.M.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olds v. BerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  2. In re the Parental Responsibilities of E.S.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. People v. LaurentColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. In Re BboSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  5. In Re EsColorado Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API