Legal Opinion

In re Fandey

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1994No. 22186PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This matter came before the Court following disciplinary proceedings conducted pursuant to the Rules Governing Discipline, SCRA 1986, 17-101 to 17-316 (Repl.Pamp.1991 & Cum.Supp.1994). In accordance with an agreement not to contest and consent to discipline reached pursuant to Rule 17-211(A), H. Daniel Fandey does not contest the allegations that he committed various violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, SCRA 1986, 16-101 to 16-805 (Repl.Pamp.1991 & Cum.Supp.1994). Pursuant to Rule 17-211(B)(1)(a), we approve and adopt the Disciplinary Board’s acceptance of Fandey’s consent…

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re OwenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  2. In re CanevaroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In re Owen and JacksonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API