In re Fandey
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This matter came before the Court following disciplinary proceedings conducted pursuant to the Rules Governing Discipline, SCRA 1986, 17-101 to 17-316 (Repl.Pamp.1991 & Cum.Supp.1994). In accordance with an agreement not to contest and consent to discipline reached pursuant to Rule 17-211(A), H. Daniel Fandey does not contest the allegations that he committed various violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, SCRA 1986, 16-101 to 16-805 (Repl.Pamp.1991 & Cum.Supp.1994). Pursuant to Rule 17-211(B)(1)(a), we approve and adopt the Disciplinary Board’s acceptance of Fandey’s consent…
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re OwenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- In re CanevaroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- In re Owen and JacksonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013