Hay v. Boggs
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the superior court for Clarice county, McMaster, J., entered March 5, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, granting only part of the relief prayed for, in an action for a divorce and to declare a trust.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
Prior to September 2, 1911, appellant and Aaron Hay were husband and wife. On that day, a decree of divorce was granted appellant, in which all of the property, both real and personal, then owned or possessed by Aaron Hay, was awarded to appellant. So far as this record goes, the only property affected by this decree was forty acres of land in Clarice county, for which Aaron Hay had obtained a contract of purchase from the Northern Pacific Railway Company, on August 5, 1904, and while he and appellant were husband and wife. This tract was, on August *33024, 1907, assigned by Hay, representing…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Homer v. Dadeland Shopping Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Jackson v. RaisorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
- Motor Sales Corporation v. WisdomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923