Legal Opinion
Gormel v. Prudential Insurance of America
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 2, 1989PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion to dismiss denied, with leave to renew upon the argument of the appeal. Memorandum: An order resettling a prior order is appealable provided, however, that it "contain[s] a change that is a material one so as to be, in effect, a new determination, thereby creating a corresponding new right to appeal” (Matter of Kolasz v Levitt, 63 AD2d 777, 779; see, Singer v Board of Educ., 97 AD2d 507; May v May, 66 AD2d 918). PresenLCallahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Davis, JJ.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kolasz v. LevittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Singer v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- May v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
3Cited by6 opinions
- Weksler v. WekslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Long v. ClearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Biotech Surgical Supply, Inc. v. Country Wide Ins. Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
- Family One Chiropractor, P.C. v. Country-Wide Ins. Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
- Sweeney v. Niagara Lutheran Dev., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.