Bell v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Commissioner Sandidge—
Affirming.
Appellant, William Bell’s administratrix, instituted this action and sought to recover from appellee, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company and I. H. Mooy, for the death of her intestate, upon the theory that it was caused by tbeir negligence. At tbe conclusion of all the .evidence tbe trial court peremptorily instructed tbe jury to find for appellees. Hence tbe appeal.
Appellant insists that tbe court erred in awarding appellees tbe peremptory instruction. Tbe undisputed facts ar.e these: Three railroad dump cars and a spreader .car bad…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Prestonsburg Superior Oil Gas Co. v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Southern Planing Mill v. HebelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- Consolidated Coach Corporation v. Earl's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Lehman v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. DeakinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947