Legal Opinion

Nadler v. Treptow

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 11, 1969No. 53354PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNELL, Justice.

This is an action at law for the collection of attorney fees. Defendants denied the accuracy of the charges and counterclaimed claiming plaintiff’s services were self-serving and not in the best interests of his client. The trial court sitting as the trier of the facts allowed a little less than 54% of plaintiff’s claim against one de*104fendant and disallowed the counterclaim. Defendants appealed.

The judgment was against Elease Trep-tow only. She will be referred to as defendant.

The basic issues are factual. Our review is not de novo. Findings of fact in a law action are binding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moffitt Building Material Co. v. U. S. Lumber & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  2. Bingham v. BlunkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  3. Broadston v. Jasper County Savings Bank, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. LOW RENT HOUSING COM'N, ETC.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. Schulte v. MauerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Anderson v. Low Rent Housing CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  4. Kitchen v. Stockman National Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  5. Nadler v. TreptowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API