Legal Opinion
Rotunno v. Pathmark
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 16, 1995PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.), dated June 17, 1994, as granted the defendant Pathmark’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
*571In this slip-and-fall case, it was incumbent upon the plaintiff to come forward with evidence showing that the defendant Pathmark had either created the allegedly dangerous condition or that it had actual or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Anderson v. Klein's Foods, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Anderson v. Klein's Foods, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Edwards v. Terryville Meat Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Monje v. Wegman's EnterprisesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kraemer v. K-Mart CorporationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Ruggiero v. Waldbaums Supermarkets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Katsoris v. Waldbaum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- McCague v. Walsh ConstructionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Rojas v. Supermarkets General Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.