Maietta v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant Donald Peter Maietta challenges the decision by the district court sustaining the revocation of appellant’s driver’s license, arguing that (1) his refusal to submit to testing was reasonable; and (2) he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel.
FACTS
The parties stipulated to the following facts: Appellant was arrested on April 26, 2002, for DWI, and an officer read appellant the implied consent advisory. The completed implied consent advisory stated that appellant understood that refusal to take a test was a crime. Appellant then told the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Berge v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kimberly Ann McGovern v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Maietta v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003