Legal Opinion

Montoro v. Bethlehem Township Zoning Hearing Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1990No. 894 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARRY, Judge.

Ralph and Mary Montoro, appellants, are equitable owners of a parcel of land consisting of two contiguous lots, each 20 feet wide and 110 feet long. Appellants wish to build a home on this parcel which is currently owned by George and Mary Enstrom, Mary Montoro’s parents. The Enstroms own four more lots of the same size adjacent to the parcel in question. The Enstrom home is situated on this four lot parcel. The Enstroms purchased these four lots over thirty years ago, but they did not purchase the parcel in question until 1969 when they needed the land to build a drainage…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. West Goshen Township v. CraterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Parkside Associates, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Township of Middletown v. Middletown Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Swift v. ZH BD. OF E. HEMPFIELD TWP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Rogers v. Zoning Hearing Board of East Pikeland TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alpine, Inc. v. Abington Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. J.J. Loughran v. Valley View Developers, Inc. ~ Appeal of: Estate of Milton Parker, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Lebeduik v. Bethlehem Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API