Legal Opinion

Matter of Woloschak Farms

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 26, 1987No. 19-30443PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILLIAM T. BODOH, Bankruptcy Judge.

This cause came on for consideration of the Motions of DEUTZ-ALLIS CREDITOR CORPORATION (“DEUTZ”) and JOHN DEERE COMPANY (“JOHN DEERE”) to Dismiss this pending Chapter 12 case. Movants argue that the Debtor may not maintain this Chapter 12 proceeding because there was pending at the time of its filing a case under Chapter 11 of Title 11, United States Code, in which the Debtor was in default of a previously confirmed Plan of Reorganization. DEUTZ also argues that the Chapter 12 Petition should be dismissed for the reason that Debtor is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Memphis Bank & Trust Company v. Linda Gail WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  2. In Re Mary E. Johnson, Debtor. Mary E. Johnson v. Vanguard Holding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of Woloschak FarmsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
  2. In Re RossmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
  3. United States v. Woloschak Farms (In Re Woloschak Farms)District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1989
  4. In Re RyderUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API