Legal Opinion

Argintar, Et Ux. v. Lydell

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 7, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is an appeal from a final decree adverse to the defendants below, appellants here, in a mortgage foreclosure proceeding wherein the defendants set up usury as a defense.

In the final decree the chancellor made a finding of fact which reads as follows :

“It is doubtful if any useful purpose would be served by stating all of the facts as they appear in the record. However, the Court finds as follows: That plaintiff, an elderly widow in Michigan, entrusted funds belonging to her, to her brother, one John S. Noel, a broker, residing and engaged in business in West Palm Beach, Florida; that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chandler and Chandler v. KendrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Clark v. GreySupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Pushee v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. The Richter Jewelry Co. v. SchweinertSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. Mason v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dixon v. SharpSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Shaffran v. HolnessDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  3. River Hills, Inc. v. EdwardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Stewart v. NangleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  5. Dezell v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API