Legal Opinion
Argintar, Et Ux. v. Lydell
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided April 7, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This is an appeal from a final decree adverse to the defendants below, appellants here, in a mortgage foreclosure proceeding wherein the defendants set up usury as a defense.
In the final decree the chancellor made a finding of fact which reads as follows :
“It is doubtful if any useful purpose would be served by stating all of the facts as they appear in the record. However, the Court finds as follows: That plaintiff, an elderly widow in Michigan, entrusted funds belonging to her, to her brother, one John S. Noel, a broker, residing and engaged in business in West Palm Beach, Florida; that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chandler and Chandler v. KendrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Clark v. GreySupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Pushee v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- The Richter Jewelry Co. v. SchweinertSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Mason v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dixon v. SharpSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Shaffran v. HolnessDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- River Hills, Inc. v. EdwardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Stewart v. NangleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Dezell v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.