Wendell McIntosh v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal from a narcotics conviction involves the trial court’s refusal to declare a mistrial when a government witness referred to another person, who had questioned the defendant after his arrest, as “the parole officer”. Though the witness did not say this person was the defendant’s parole officer, the quoted phrase may have implied that he was, and thus may have implied that the defendant had previously been convicted of some offense. The prosecutor did not elicit the quoted phrase. The defendant did not testify.
In our opinion the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Richard E. Leigh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- United States v. GialloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- United States v. James E. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Goins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- United States v. Jessie R. CarterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Hosley Berry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.