J & F Harig Co. v. Fountain Square Building, Inc.

OPINION

By HAMILTON, PJ.

The validity of the bonds is not in question, but it is contended by the Harig Company that its lien is a prior' lien and senior to the mortgage bonds.

If the liens claimed are valid, they are senior to the other liens.

We will first consider the claim of The M. H. Crane Company. The Crane Company did not prosecute error or appeal from the decision of the Court of Common Pleas. It claims the right to have its lien considered by this court under the. general rule that an appeal brings the whole case before the appellate court. In other words, can the Crane Company inject…