Legal Opinion
Amorray Wilson v. Myles S. Hylton, United States Postal Service, John Does 1-10, and AMC Corporations 1-10
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 3, 2026No. 2:25-cv-02070Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY AMORRAY WILSON, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:25-cv-02070 (BRM) (JSA) v. OPINION MYLES S. HYLTON, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN DOES 1-10 (fictitious persons responsible for the damages suffered by Plaintiff), and AMC CORPORATIONS 1-10 (fictitious corporations or entities responsible for the damages suffered by Plaintiff), Defendants. MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Plaintiff Amorray Wilson’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Default Judgment (the “Motion”) against Defendant Myles S. Hylton (“Hylton”) pursuant to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- David Petrucelli Tracy A. Petrucelli, Husband and Wife v. Bohringer and Ratzinger, Gmbh Ausdereitungsanlagen Jake Diel Construction MacHine Inc. Teco Electric and MacHine Company, Ltd. v. Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc., Third-Party David Petrucelli and Tracy A. PetrucelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.