Legal Opinion

Hexcel Corp. v. Conap, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1987No. 2-87-153-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

KELTNER, Justice.

B.F. Goodrich filed a motion to dismiss the appeal of Hexcel Corporation for Hex-cel’s failure to give notice of filing of its cost bond in violation of TEX.R.APP.P. 46(d).

We grant the motion to dismiss.

The facts in this case are typical of a growing problem facing appellate courts. The record is clear that required notice of filing the cost bond was not timely given by Hexcel (appellant).

In 1979, the plaintiff, Betty Kirkpatrick, joined by her husband, James Kirkpatrick, (not a party to this appeal), brought suit against Hexcel Corporation,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harrison v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Nolana Development Ass'n v. Jefferson Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Longbine v. Corpus Christi Lodge No. 189, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Duenas v. Garland Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
  2. Teague v. EspinosaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API