Legal Opinion

Miller v. Frampton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 26, 1924No. 13554PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

STEPHENSON, O.

Heretofore Henry D. Miller, plaintiff, then being in possession of certain of the school lands under lease, made default in the payment of the annual rentals thereon for a period of more than three months. On due notice by the School Land Commission to the plaintiff, the Commission heard and determined a forfeiture proceeding under the provisions of section 9384, against the plaintiff. Thereafter the School Land Commission, under the provisions of section 9333, issued a writ of ouster against the lessee and placed the same in the hands of one of the defendants in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Wilhite v. CruceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Marshall v. SittonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Horany v. State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  2. State ex rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. TarpenningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API