City of Wilmington v. Schutt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarNhill, J.
A justice of the peace has no equity jurisdiction, and when the remedy sought in a suit on contract is, in whole or in part, equitable in nature the action must be instituted and maintained in the Superior Court, irrespective of the amount in controversy. McIntosh, P. & P., sec. 62, p. 60; Kiser v. Blanton, 123 N. C., 400; Sewing Machine Co. v. Burger, 181 N. C., 241, 107 S. E., 14; Grocery Co. v. Banks, 185 N. C., 149, 116 S. E., 173.
When the amount sought to be recovered in such an action is less than $200, “it is not now required that the debt should be first reduced to judgment, as a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Patterson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Barron v. . CainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Sewing Machine Co. v. . BurgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Town of Wadesboro v. CoxeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- W. C. Kiser & Co. v. BlantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- RGK, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Foust v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- RGK, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.