Rose v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FLOYD ROSE, Petitioner, 15-CR-594 (JPO) -v- 19-CV-3974 (JPO) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Floyd Rose petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Civ. Dkt. No. 1 (“Pet.”).) Proceeding pro se, Rose challenges the legality of the sentence entered against him following his plea of guilty to one count of Hobbs Act robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 1951. (See Crim. Dkt. No. 69.) Rose argues that the Hobbs Act’s jurisdictional element is so vague as to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.