Legal Opinion

Rose v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 3, 2019No. 1:19-cv-03974Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FLOYD ROSE, Petitioner, 15-CR-594 (JPO) -v- 19-CV-3974 (JPO) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Floyd Rose petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Civ. Dkt. No. 1 (“Pet.”).) Proceeding pro se, Rose challenges the legality of the sentence entered against him following his plea of guilty to one count of Hobbs Act robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 1951. (See Crim. Dkt. No. 69.) Rose argues that the Hobbs Act’s jurisdictional element is so vague as to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API