Legal Opinion
Maatuk v. Guttman
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 27, 2009No. B200675PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
173 Cal.App.4th 1191 (2009)
___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___
JOSEF MAATUK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
BRUCE J. GUTTMAN et al., Defendants and Respondents.
No. B200675.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.
March 27, 2009.
Kosnett & Durchfort and David E. Durchfort for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, Roy G. Weatherup, Bartley L. Becker and Allison Ann Arabian for Defendants and Respondents.
OPINION
ARMSTRONG, J.
Josef Maatuk appeals from the judgment entered in favor of respondent Bruce J. Guttman, on Maatuk's complaint. We affirm.
Facts
Respondent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Tudor Ranches, Inc. v. State Comp. Ins. FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Lockheed Litigation CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Board of Trustees v. PoriniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Clauser/Wells PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anderson v. Kids Included Together CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Ludwig v. Hacienda Paraiso CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2016