Legal Opinion

Kay v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 22, 2010No. 1D09-5175PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

REVERSED. See Yerrick v. State, 979 So.2d 1228, 1230 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (“Florida law provides that to prove the crime of grand theft, the State must establish the defendant had the requisite criminal intent at the time of the taking.”); Benitez v. State, 852 So.2d 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Crawford v. State, 453 So.2d 1139 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

BENTON, C.J., THOMAS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crawford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Benitez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. YERRICK v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Huggins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012