Pope v. Muth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellants challenge the lower court’s order authorizing appellees’ placement of utilities within a private road to be constructed on appellants’ property. We agree with the lower court’s determination and, accordingly, affirm.
In late 1980, appellees petitioned for the right to construct a private road from their property through appellants’ property, in order to gain access to a main road. A Board of View, appointed pursuant to 36 P.S. § 2731 1 recommended that appellees be permitted to build a 25'-wide road and to place utilities therein. The lower court, upon review,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dowgiel v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Little AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Mattei v. HurayCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- In Re Private Road in Nescopeck TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re PackardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Beers v. RaubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- MAZZANTE v. McClintockCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- In Re: Petition of B.R. Adams and J.M. Adams, his wife ~ Appeal of: W. Dittmar and J.M. CorlCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Beers v. RaubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.